The smallest chiral hydrocarbon?

Last week I posed the following question:

What is the lowest molecular weight hydrocarbon that is chiral? (A couple of restrictions — isotopes don’t count, so no deuterium or 13C, and no conformational stereoisomers, I’m looking for stable enantiomers at room temperature).

This all came about because of a question I used on an exam I wrote a few years ago for an undergraduate organic chemistry class. My intention was to ask the same question on the blog but, of course, I accidentally missed out a few details — which ended up making the question a bit more interesting. The original question asked the students to identify the lowest molecular mass cyclic alkane (the previous question on the exam had asked about the corresponding acyclic alkane). I don’t really remember how well the class did on the question, but the structure I gave on the exam’s answer key was trans-1,2-dimethylcyclopropane (1). It turns out that this might not — technically speaking — have been the best answer… sorry kids.

Well, if you don’t specify ‘alkane’ and you use the word ‘hydrocarbon’ instead, that means unsaturated systems are fair game — and this means that there are better answers than 1. There seem to be four fairly reasonable isomers of C5H8 that fit the bill — compounds 2-5 below. I was quite happy with this set of answers until a few clever people on Twitter suggested some others. @MatToddChem came up with the bicyclobutane structure (6), although this does violate Bredt’s rule. Then @zhorakovsky followed up with the bicyclopentane (7) and bicyclopentene (8) compounds — but these structures are probably far too strained to exist with those trans-fused ring junctions. Finally, @stephengdavey pointed out that 1,2-cyclobutadiene (9) would also be a valid answer, if it existed.

So, while all of these answers are OK on paper, the blue ones are much more likely to exist that the red ones. Nevertheless, from what seems to be a very simple question, you can start thinking about structure, bonding, isomerism, stereochemistry, and strain. And if it floats your boat*, nomenclature too (*it doesn’t mine, and this might be the topic of a future post). And that bit above where I mentioned not giving the correct answer on the original exam? Well, that bicyclopentane structure (7) is definitely an alkane and has a lower molecular mass than the trans-dimethylcyclopropane (1)… in my defence, however, 7 probably doesn’t exist.

Thanks to everyone else who suggested answers on Twitter or in the comments of the original post!

This entry was posted in Fun, Quiz time! and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to The smallest chiral hydrocarbon?

  1. Paul says:

    Love it, though I would probably give this one to the kiddos on a homework rather than a test. If you were to give it on an exam, there’d be no end to the complaints from students.

  2. mattoddchem says:

    Yes, I gave it to my 3rd year undergrad class in the 40-minute-in nap doldrums and they got 1, 3 and 5 in a few minutes of group effort. It’s a great question. I drew 6 up on the board and explained Bredt’s rule. In response, one student drew a kite string on it and some wind effects.

  3. You can always count them, but how do you find which is the most stable? Are there some rules or does one have to do calculations?

    • stu says:

      Well, the only way to be sure would be to do some calculations – but I don’t know what flavour as I know next to nothing about computational chemistry. The blue structures are definitely more stable than the red, and I imagine the cyclobutene is more stable than the cyclopropenes — I don’t know how the allene fits in though. As for the red structures, I imagine the strain increases very much from left to right, although I’m not 100% sure about where structure 6 fits in.

  4. Ash says:

    Great question. I could try out some calculations on the structures.

    -And if it floats your boat*

    Not really, but it does float my chair (sorry, couldn’t resist!)

  5. lastpook says:

    Hey, demethylated 6 is also chiral because of different possible orientations of bridgehead hydrogen. So it’s the same MW as 9!

  6. DrFreddy says:

    And compound 7 does indeed exist. At least almost. Look up CAS# 96442-65-8 (racemate) 60426-74-6 (enantiomer) in SciFinder. Deuterium analogs of said compound, 12 literature references in total.

  7. stu says:

    Hmm, don’t have access to SciFinder… but really, a trans-3,4-ring junction?! Are they just theoretical studies?

  8. jess says:

    The strain on (9) makes my head hurt. I thought of cyclobutadiene (the 1,3 isomer) but then realized that it not supposed to exist, being anti-aromatic and all… though I have to wonder if it’s more likely to exist than (9)?

    I really like these types of questions when I was a student (and still do!)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s